Correctional Subculture Essay

The punitory subculture has various respectable questions pertaining to a correction officer and his duties. According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), when an officer makes the decision to reprimand or write a disciplinary report, he is playing a role in the Criminal Justice System (p. 316). A disciplinary committee also has a dilemma because he, or she must decide on what penalty should accrue towards the offender. This may be a temporary privation of privileges, or he may stomach his sentence increased (p. 316, para. 2). A correctional officer in uniform is an authority figure, which implies reasonable and judicious control over the incarcerated. Moreover, he has the full range of coercive control over inmates excessive force, loss of liberty, and his power may be defiant taught through his subculture (other correctional officers).According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), many correctional officers hold (deontological) exceptional knowledge and practice sea captainism. Wh ile others tend to use (teleological) coercive, control against offenders gain advantage (pp. 317-318). A correctional officer must engage in ethical behavior. He must act professional show respect for the incarcerated be consistent maintain integrity and honesty and act impartial (p. 318).The subculture of a correctional officer has similar aspects of police subculture. However, cover-ups and wrongdoing is apparent in both. According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), a correctional officer volition travel to administer aid for a nonher officer. Again, as police officers, correctional officers will not cooperate in an investigation if it pertains to a feller officer (blue code). One would not humble another in front of an offender because this may jeopardize an officers effectiveness. A fellow officer does not indulge in a white hat. This pertains to showing emotions towards an inmate or his family. A main similarity betwixt correctional and police officers is that both engage in solidarity, against all alfresco groups (pp. 320-321).In conclusion, few officers endorse and publicize subcultural values, whereas the majorities, who are silent, privately believe in different values. In fact, his morals tend to make judgments on their own. This can be based onhis religion what is easily or bad based on what is morally wrong, utilitarianism a bad action turning into a good deed (a selfless act), natural law universally acceptable and ethical formalism the figure of good will. According to Thomson and Wadsworth (2005), correctional officers are faced with these dilemmas on a daily basis.Moreover, the disagreement between morality and justice comes not from the difference between actions and consequences (as between morality and influence ethics) but from the difference between motives and actions (pp. 325-327). Therefore, when a C.O. does not practice morals and does not follow the ethical code he may drift into relativistic egoism. He may believe he should re ceive benefits for his trouble, and he does not think of the latter consequences to his actions.ReferencesAxia College of University of Phoenix. (2005). Chapter 11 Ethics in Crime and Justice, Ethics for Correctional Professions. Retrieved October 6, 2008, fromAxia College, Week eight reading AXcess, ADJ 235- Ethics and the Administration of Justice